Thursday, October 8, 2009

Eco_nomics vs. Economics: Open_Notes 2

reevaluating the world economy - the world economy fails to recognize 1/2 of the population's work and value - dismissal vs. equal representation of women - our system is totally and utterly corrupt - women's work of little or no worth - does not generate cash - no value - national accounts, GNP calculations vs. environment, volunteers, homemakers, etc.

"total cost" economics necessity - ie., dung (fuel, fertilizer) non-primary product, no economic activity (vs. actual mass third-world activity) - Jeremy Rifkin: guaranteed annual wage, paid third-sector volunteerism - the system includes everything that goes through the math phase - a cash generating capacity - no value other than money - regardless of how that money is made - no value to peace, preservation of natural resources, to unpaid work, including motherhood, parenting - this system cannot respond to values it refuses to recognize.

the art of politics = managing limited resources (ie., money, non-renewable resources), this is economics; with limitless resources (ie., renewable resources, dated money_tokens), economics as a field essentially dies - the ecology of limited resources = economics - "green consumerism" is consuming alternatives not consuming less - "green consumerism" = retail therapy -- killing people is considered very valuable in the international economic system - arms exports account for more than half the trade surplus of the developed economies - but the death, homelessness, injury, poverty, starvation, caused by the use of these weapons are not even registered as a deficit - the institutions of power are intellectually and spiritually corrupt; participatory democracy is not how it happens - growing worse. -- [based on CBC Futureworld, Marilyn Waring, 1975 NZ MP - Chair of Public Expenditures Committee; NFB 1995 film "Who's Counting?" - author, "Counting for Nothing", May.98]
Share/Save/Bookmark

No comments:

Post a Comment

Mammon or Messiah research contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is presented without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.