legal historian Carl Mayer suggests a new amendment to the US Constitution, as follows:
[5] THIS AMENDMENT ENSHRINES THE SANCTITY OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND ESTABLISHES THE PRESUMPTION THAT INDIVIDUALS ARE ENTITLED TO A GREATER MEASURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS THAN CORPORATIONS - FOR PURPOSES OF THE FOREGOING AMENDMENTS, CORPORATIONS ARE NOT CONSIDERED "PERSONS," NOR ARE THEY ENTITLED TO THE SAME BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS AS INDIVIDUALS - SUCH PROTECTIONS MAY ONLY BE CONFERRED BY STATE LEGISLATURES OR IN POPULAR REFERENDA
- the second reform - allowing for revocation of the corporate charter - would permit corporations to mold their behavior in response to a real threat of capital punishment, counterbalancing the short-term need to externalize costs and make a profit - charter revocation spells corporate death - such a threat would give everyone in the corporation an enormous incentive to check corporate crimes and harms before they got out of hand.
outfitting corporations with a perpetual threat of death would concentrate the minds of management, shareholders and workers wonderfully, providing a strong, continuing incentive for ethical behavior - such a perpetual threat would humanize and civilize the corporate form, which in recent years has arguably emerged as our most rogue and dangerous institution.
-- [excerpts 1-6] [based on Peter Montague, Ph.D., RACHEL'S HAZARDOUS WASTE NEWS #388 May 5, 1994]
[1] Lester R. Brown and others, STATE OF THE WORLD 1994 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1994); Lester R. Brown and others, VITAL SIGNS 1993 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1993).
[2] Robert A.G. Monks and Nell Minow, POWER AND ACCOUNTABILITY (New York: Harper Collins, 1991), pg. 24.
[3] Richard Grossman and Frank T. Adams, TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS; CITIZENSHIP AND THE CHARTER OF INCORPORATION (Cambridge, Mass.: Charter, Inc., 1992).
[4] For 50 ways to reform corporations see Russell Mokhiber, CORPORATE CRIME AND VIOLENCE (San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1988), pgs. 38-65.
[5] Carl J. Mayer, "Personalizing the Impersonal: Corporations and the Bill of Rights," HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL Vol. 41 No. 3 (March 1990), pgs. 577-667.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Mammon or Messiah research contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is presented without profit for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.
No comments:
Post a Comment